Despite
what is stereotypically seen as a bad film is one that is just made for the
sake for soulless cash and nothing more, there have been times were a movie
clearly has something more to offer but still unfortunately misses the mark.
Sometimes there are movies that have some interesting ideas, great ambition and
a good cast and director to boot, but still miss the mark on creating an
over-all engaging movie. A Wrinkle in
Time is one of those movies, one that has great intentions but sadly doesn’t
succeed all that well as a film.
The
story centers around a girl named Meg, who is having trouble with her life
after her father disappears suddenly during his research on different
dimensions. Things change when three mysterious figures come into her life to
not only help find her father, but help her discover herself while having her try
to save their own universe. The film’s ultimate goal is one of the few elements
that really shine through with its overall theme and message about accepting
oneself. It is a message seen many times before, but the way this film executes
it is very well done, giving a different way of showcasing how one shouldn’t
strive for perfection and try to love them for who they are. It is an important
message for kids to learn and the film does it in a very mature and thoughtful
way. However, as good as the message is, the story over-all doesn’t impress, as
the film focuses too much of its time on exposition. Unlike something like a
Nolan movie, where there is a lot of exposition but still manages to be
interesting, Wrinkle in Time doesn’t
have the inventive world building or tight script to really make the film’s
exposition that exciting. Most of the film is just talking about these ideas
but not written in a way that’s as engaging as it should be, or in a way where
it really fleshes out the film’s characters. It’s a shame to see this film not
fleshed out that much because Disney could have had a very fun and inventive
science fiction movie on their hands, but it just ends up surprisingly dull.
The other downside to Wrinkle in Time is that the characters don’t fare much better in terms
of making the film as engaging as it should be. The main character of Meg isn’t
the most developed character out there as we get the basics of her backstory but
the way her character progress through the film, doesn’t feel as natural as it
should be. The actress playing her does a fine job however, same with most of
the other child actors in this film, they’re given a script that makes them
talk more like adults rather than children and sometimes it can feel really
flat in terms of performance. As for the mythical characters played by Mindy
Kaling, Reese Witherspoon and Oprah, for how much of a presence they have in
the film their characters are also seen as kind of flat. They’re not given
enough screen time to really be developed and they don’t have much of a
personality asides from spouting exposition and having a minor quirk that doesn’t
really go anyway. Whenever they do have some personality, they come across as
ridiculously over the top, but then again with their outlandish costumes, it
can be hard to take some of their dialogue seriously. Chris Pine gives the best
performance in the film, being not too over the top and also having a bit of
heart to his character, with him being the loving father that couldn’t be there
due to circumstances. However, that’s as best as the film goes with characters,
even if it story was a bit messy, if the characters were a bit more memorable,
then it would have made up for some of the shortcomings.
Considering
a big budget special effects style movie like this doesn’t come around every so
often, you would think the film would be very impressive to look at, and in some
ways yes but in other ways no. The film does manage to be incredibly bright and
colorful at various points, and it can be very pleasing the eyes and production
design wise, there are many elements that look visually unique. When a film
uses something in the vain of drawings as an effects sequence, then there
definitely needs to be some credit given where it is due. Where the film falls
short however is that there are also a decent amount of moments where it goes
on effects overload. It feels like a lot
of sci-fi films were it just seems to have an overabundance of CG at numerous
points, even if it is well design; it doesn’t quite feel that real. It also
doesn’t help that there is some choppy moments of editing at points, too many
close up shots of characters faces, lackluster green screen and one of the unintentionally
weirdest visual moments ever put in a recent blockbuster. It’s a shame
considering that Ava Duvernay has proven herself to create a competent movie in
the past, but here, it doesn’t quite mesh as well as it should have.
Wrinkle in Time
is far from an awfully put together movie but it does feel like it was some
wasted potential. Its intentions are great and it has a lot of ambition, but as
a film, it just doesn’t go together as smoothly as it should. With its weird
moments and ambitious ideas however, it could potentially be a cult film in the
vain of other Disney Live action movies that try to do something different. But
as it stands, it just comes across as a bit of a dull mess that could have been
cleaned up much better than how it was put together.
No comments:
Post a Comment